Alaskan Crude Corporation v. State, Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \ordinarily there is no right to a hearing on the issue of attorney's fees\
• affirming the Conservation Commission’s decision not to reclassify Burglin 33-1 as a gas-only well and its recommended RPS for the well
• affirming superior court decision affirming agency decision denying application to reclassify North Slope oil well as gas facility to exempt it from oil discharge contingency plan requirements for reopening well

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).