Alaska Pacific Trading Co. v. Eagon Forest Products, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• when seller sent a proposal for modification of preexisting contract to buyer and buyer did not respond, no contract modification occurred because modification requires mutual assent
• \An intent to repudiate may be expressly asserted or circumstantially manifested by conduct.\ (quoting CKP, Inc. v. GRS Constr. Co. , 63 Wash.App. 601 , 821 P.2d 63 , 74 (1991) )
• “The adequacy of a written demand for assurances is a question of fact.”
• “An intent to repu‐ diate may be expressly asserted or circumstantially mani‐ fested by conduct.” (quoting CKP, Inc. v. GRS Constr. Co., 821 P.2d 63, 74 (Wash. Ct. App. 1991))
• “An intent to repu‐ diate may be expressly asserted or circumstantially mani‐ fested by conduct.” (quoting CKP, Inc. v. GRS Constr. Co., 821 P.2d 63, 74 (Wash. Ct. App. 1991))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).