Alaska Interstate v. Houston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a formal controversion is not needed for the Board to award fees under AS 23.30.145(a) if claim is controverted in fact
• holding that controversion in fact is sufficient for fees under AS 23.30.145(a)
• noting that an appeal from a workers compensation board decision should not be dismissed merely because it was titled as a complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).