Alaska-Canadian Corporation v. Ancow Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering the fact that non-movant affiant failed to deny statements made by movant-affiant in concluding that summary judgment in favor of movant was proper
• stating that “it was incumbent that the party opposing the [summary judgment] motion clearly state its position or defense and show the court how it planned to support its position or defense with facts which would be admissible in evidence at the trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).