Alart Associates, Inc. v. Aptaker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss, and affirming its decision to allow the plaintiff to correct its name in its complaint, because (1) the misidentified copyright claimant was sufficiently close to the plaintiff’s true name, (2
• denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss, and affirming its decision to allow the plaintiff to correct its name in its complaint, because (1) the misidentified copyright claimant was sufficiently close to the plaintiff’s true name, (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).