Ninth Circuit· 10/20/1982
Alaniz v. California Processors, Inc.
Citations
- 690 F.2d 717
- 30 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 97
- 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 24699
- 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 33,108
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \[T]he parties ask us to view their conduct throughout the proceedings below as constituting the necessary consent. This we decline to do.\
- “[T]he parties ask us to view their conduct throughout the proceedings below as constituting the necessary consent. This we decline to do.”
- scope of authority to which parties consent is relevant factor in determining whether magistrate judge's exercise of jurisdiction valid
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alarcon, Anderson, Nelson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Clay Ambrose v. Neil Welch, George Wilson, Stephen Smith, Dewey Sowders, J.B. Owens, F. Richardsville, Sidney McDaniels and Robert HodgeSixth Circuit· 1984-03-21· cited 140×
- Anant Kumar Tripati v. Richard H. Rison, WardenNinth Circuit· 1988-05-23· cited 94×
- Eldridge Lovelace v. Linda DallSeventh Circuit· 1987-05-18· cited 92×
- Leroy L. Trufant v. Autocon, Inc., a Subsidiary of Camco, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1984-03-21· cited 83×
- Alden E. Serine v. Oakley Peterson, Cecil Quesseth, Arloe Quesseth, and State of Oregon Right of Way DepartmentNinth Circuit· 1993-03-31· cited 56×
- Cecil O. Adams v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services of the United StatesSeventh Circuit· 1986-06-26· cited 50×
- Estate of Conners ex rel. Meredith v. O'ConnorNinth Circuit· 1993-10-04· cited 40×
- Firoz Jaliwala, Doing Business as Colorgem v. United States of America, and Five Oceans Gem Corporation and Bretislav Stasny, InterveningSeventh Circuit· 1991-10-09· cited 39×
- United States v. William M. Bryson, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 1992-12-16· cited 37×
- King v. Ionization International, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1987-08-04· cited 37×
- Jeremiah Geaney and Garvin Dale White v. Norman CarlsonSeventh Circuit· 1985-10-28· cited 36×
- Anthony J. Caprera v. Roy Jacobs, Sr., Individually and in His Official Capacity With the Jefferson Parish Sheriff's OfficeFifth Circuit· 1986-06-02· cited 32×
- Parks v. CollinsFifth Circuit· 1985-06-03· cited 31×
- Beverly Cooke Silberstein v. Robert Lee Silberstein, Robert Lee Silberstein, Movant-Appellant v. Robert I. KligmanSeventh Circuit· 1988-10-05· cited 30×
- Joseph Kofoed v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 48,defendant-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 2001-01-12· cited 24×
- Columbia Record Productions, Etc. v. Hot Wax Records, Inc., Etc., and Edward J. Holland, (Two Cases)Ninth Circuit· 1992-06-08· cited 21×
- Kenneth D. Hajek v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, a Corporation Montana Rail Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1999-08-05· cited 19×
- Nasca v. PeoplesoftNinth Circuit· 1998-11-17· cited 11×
- PeoplesoftNinth Circuit· 1999-01-07· cited 10×
- Aldrich v. BowenNinth Circuit· 1997-12-12· cited 9×
Other cases named Alaniz v. California Processors, Inc.
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.