Alani Consulting, Inc. and B12 Consulting, LLC. v. Alan Goerner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an LMRDA claim for monetary damages was not rendered moot following a plaintiff union treasurer’s reinstatement
• allowing a LMRDA claim to proceed where charges were filed against the plaintiff in retaliation for his support of alternative candidates in union elections, even though the charges were later dropped
• \[T]he issue is...whether the decision of the dispute continues to be justified by sufficient prospect that it will have impact on the parties.\
• “The plenary standard of review seems appropriate since mootness doctrine relates to courts’ constitutional authority to hear a case. . . .”
• “[T]he issue is . . . whether the decision of the dispute continues to be justified by sufficient prospect that it will have impact on the parties.”
• “ ‘expansive protection’ [is] given to union members’ speech rights.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).