· 7/10/2000
Alan Stuart G. Raleigh Hanbury v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America, and Desert Hospital
Citations
- 217 F.3d 1145
- 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5598
- 55 Fed. R. Serv. 720
- 24 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2217
- 2000 Daily Journal DAR 7467
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15820
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that 9 such a document is “excluded from the definition of hearsay and is admissible evidence”
- holding district court erred by concluding contract was inadmissible hearsay because “it is a legally operative document that defines the rights and liabilities of the parties in this case.” (citation omitted)
- “employers must satisfy all four requirements of the safe harbor regulation for otherwise qualified group insurance plans to be exempt from ERISA coverage”
- policy tended to prove intent to create ERISA plan by referring to ERISA
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brunetti, Fletcher, Wardlaw
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.