Skip to main content
· 7/10/2000

Alan Stuart G. Raleigh Hanbury v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America, and Desert Hospital

Citations

  • 217 F.3d 1145
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5598
  • 55 Fed. R. Serv. 720
  • 24 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2217
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 7467
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15820

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that 9 such a document is “excluded from the definition of hearsay and is admissible evidence”
  • holding district court erred by concluding contract was inadmissible hearsay because “it is a legally operative document that defines the rights and liabilities of the parties in this case.” (citation omitted)
  • “employers must satisfy all four requirements of the safe harbor regulation for otherwise qualified group insurance plans to be exempt from ERISA coverage”
  • policy tended to prove intent to create ERISA plan by referring to ERISA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brunetti, Fletcher, Wardlaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.