Alan Neff v. Commonwealth of Virginia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an unchallenged finding is “binding on the parties for purposes of appeal” (quoting Today Homes, Inc. v. Williams, 272 Va. 462, 470 (2006))
• holding that an unchallenged finding is “binding on the parties for purposes of appeal” (quoting Today Homes, Inc. v. Williams, 272 Va. 462, 470 (2006))
• “The unchallenged finding of the trial court is now the law of the case and binding on the parties for purposes of appeal.” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)
• “The unchallenged finding of the trial court is now the law of the case and binding on the parties for purposes of appeal.” (quoting Today Homes, Inc. v. Williams, 272 Va. 462, 470, 634 S.E.2d 737, 742 (2006))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).