Alan Meyer v. Berkshire Life Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding there was federal question jurisdiction when a pension plan manager conceded it was an ERISA fiduciary
• finding the doctrine of judicial admission precluded a defendant from later refuting its status as an ERISA fiduciary after the district court had previously granted summary judgment as to all state law claims based on the defendant’s concession that ERISA applied
• “[D]eliberate, clear [,] and unambiguous statements by counsel may be considered judicial admissions that bind the conceding party to the representations made.” (second alteration in original) (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[D]eliberate, clear [,] and unambiguous statements by counsel may be considered judicial admissions that bind the conceding party to the representations made.” (second alteration in original) (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[D]eliberate, clear [,] and unambiguous statements by counsel may be considered judicial admissions that bind the conceding party to the representations made.” (second alteration in original) (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[D]eliberate, clear [,] and unambiguous statements by counsel may be considered judicial admissions that bind the conceding party to the representations made.” (second alteration in original) (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).