Alan Cartwright v. Alan Garner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a court may consider evidence outside of the pleadings in the case of a factual attack
• noting that courts evaluate the “factual predicates for jurisdiction,” in factual, rather than facial challenges under Rule 12(b)(1)
• explaining that “[a] factual attack challenges the factual existence of subject matter jurisdiction.
• explaining that “[a] factual attack challenges the factual existence of subject matter jurisdiction”
• explaining that “[a] factual attack challenges the factual existence of subject matter jurisdiction”
• explaining a district court resolves a facial challenge when it analyzes the complaint on its face and does not inquire into factual predicates for jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).