Skip to main content
· 5/4/1886

Alamo Ice Co. v. Yancey

Citations

  • 66 Tex. 187
  • 18 S.W. 499
  • 1886 Tex. LEXIS 478

Syllabus

<p>1. Garnishee—Intervenor—Right of appeal—Practice—A garnishee answered, admitting its indebtedness to defendants; an intervenor claimed that the money was due him, and not the defendant. The court sustained a demurrer to the plea of intervention, dismissed it from the suit, and rendered judgment in favor of plaintiff against the garnishee. Held., If the court erred in dismissing the intervention, it was the intervenor’s right to complain, and the garnishee could only appeal from a refusal to make the proposed intervenor a party at its own solicitation.</p>

Judges: Willie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.