Skip to main content
· 9/13/1996

Alameda Newspapers, Inc. v. City of Oakland, Northern California Newspaper Guild, Local 52, Newspaper Guild, Intervenor-Appellant

Citations

  • 95 F.3d 1406
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6842
  • 153 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2257
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 24119
  • 1996 WL 518059

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a city resolution urging citizen support for a local newspaper boycott was neither regulatory nor coercive but rather “a declaration of principle, rather than an exercise of governmental powers”
  • “If a municipality’s action [in a case asserting preemption by the National Labor Relations Act] does not rise to the level of regulation, it is not preempted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reinhardt, King

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.