Skip to main content
· 9/21/2016

Alameda County Social Services Agency v. T.G.

Citations

  • 3 Cal. App. 5th 557
  • 207 Cal. Rptr. 3d 642
  • 2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 789

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “[i]nfidelity alone does not preclude a CIR,” and with regard to the intent factor, evidence of infidelity is partially counterbalanced where the parties choose to remain together even after the infidelity is revealed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pollak, Siggins, Jenkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.