Skip to main content
· 6/23/1989

Alam v. State

Citations

  • 776 P.2d 345
  • 1989 Alas. App. LEXIS 51
  • 1989 WL 68198

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Alaska's legislature did not intend its kidnapping statute to be interpreted as broadly as the literal language indicated
  • concluding that the legislature's commentary to the kidnapping statute demonstrated that it did not intend the statute to be interpreted as broadly as the literal language might indicate
  • concluding restraint at issue was incidental to uncharged attempted sexual assault
  • discussing whether the restraint used by the defendant was \merely incidental\ to the commission of another crime
  • discussing requisites for a kidnapping conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bryner, Coats, Singleton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.