Alam v. Reno Hilton Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that making decisions for hiring casino dealers based on a preference for “barbie doll” images is not discriminatory
• finding that “termination of employees, even in the context of a discriminatory 21 policy, does not in itself amount to extreme and outrageous conduct actionable under an intentional 22 infliction of emotional distress theory.”
• finding that 25 “termination of employees, even in the context of a discriminatory policy, does not in itself 26 1 amount to extreme and outrageous conduct actionable under an intentional infliction of 2 emotional distress theory.”
• feelings of inferiority, headaches, irritability, and loss of ten pounds is insufficient distress as a matter of law
• Plaintiffs’ feelings of inferiority, headaches, irritability, and loss of ten pounds were insufficient to amount to severe emotional distress
• “termination of employees, even in the context of 26 a discriminatory policy, does not in itself amount to extreme and outrageous conduct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).