Alagia, Day, Trautwein & Smith v. Broadbent

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding under occurrence rule that statute of limitations does not begin to run until legal harm becomes fixed and non-speculative
• discussing fact that occurrence of legal harm and damages were fixed by settlement between IRS and taxpayer law firm
• wherein our Supreme Court appears to adopt the continuous representation rule via strong dicta
• “These are sound theoretical and practical reasons for adoption of the continuous representation rule. If this was the decisive issue, appellees would prevail as their claim was brought within one year of the date appellants’ representation came to an end.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).