Skip to main content
· 9/12/2003

Alachua County v. Scharps

Citations

  • 855 So. 2d 195
  • 2003 WL 22103776

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that whether a party has standing is a pure question of law which is reviewed de novo
  • stating that a party who is not adversely affected by the statute he or she seeks to challenge does not have standing
  • holding a taxpayer with no “special injury” lacked standing to challenge a resolution passed by a county which directed that a referendum be placed on a general election ballot, because no exception to the “special injury” rule applied
  • taxpayer standing only if personal injury or claim of violation of tax and spend provision of state constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolf

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.