· 9/12/2003
Alachua County v. Scharps
Citations
- 855 So. 2d 195
- 2003 WL 22103776
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that whether a party has standing is a pure question of law which is reviewed de novo
- stating that a party who is not adversely affected by the statute he or she seeks to challenge does not have standing
- holding a taxpayer with no “special injury” lacked standing to challenge a resolution passed by a county which directed that a referendum be placed on a general election ballot, because no exception to the “special injury” rule applied
- taxpayer standing only if personal injury or claim of violation of tax and spend provision of state constitution
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wolf
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.