Alabama v. United States Interstate Commerce Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that county’s interpretation of an ordinance in a stipulation in a mandamus action was a land use decision reviewable by LUBA
• review of LUBA determination of the correctness of a county ruling on what zoning applied to property was justiciable because LUBA decided a \current issue—one the parties dispute\ and not the outcome of a \speculative or future event\
• determination by county of applicable zoning is a land use decision
• review of LUBA determination of the correctness of a county ruling on what zoning applied to property was justiciable because LUBA decided a “current issue — one the parties dispute” and not the outcome of a “speculative or future event”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).