Skip to main content
· 11/5/1984

Alabama v. Sturdivant

Citations

  • 469 U.S. 978
  • 105 S. Ct. 378
  • 83 L. Ed. 2d 314
  • 53 U.S.L.W. 3341
  • 1984 U.S. LEXIS 4246

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • excessively broad class complaint alleging generalized racial discrimination claims does not satisfy notice requirements of American Pipe
  • limitations period begins to run when plaintiff knows or should have known of the union’s alleged breach
  • court erred in ordering restitution in an amount not to exceed $787,000, the loss figure to which the parties had stipulated, where defendant was convicted on an indictment alleging specific losses of only $46,250
  • limiting restitution to amounts alleged in indictment
  • hybrid § 301 unfair representation claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.