· 11/5/1984
Alabama v. Sturdivant
Citations
- 469 U.S. 978
- 105 S. Ct. 378
- 83 L. Ed. 2d 314
- 53 U.S.L.W. 3341
- 1984 U.S. LEXIS 4246
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- excessively broad class complaint alleging generalized racial discrimination claims does not satisfy notice requirements of American Pipe
- limitations period begins to run when plaintiff knows or should have known of the union’s alleged breach
- court erred in ordering restitution in an amount not to exceed $787,000, the loss figure to which the parties had stipulated, where defendant was convicted on an indictment alleging specific losses of only $46,250
- limiting restitution to amounts alleged in indictment
- hybrid § 301 unfair representation claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.