Supreme Court· 10/6/1975

Alabama v. Prince

Citations

423 U.S. 876
96 S. Ct. 147

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

\[T]he speedy trial right is designed to protect against two distinct types of prejudice--'prejudice to [the] defendant's defense and prejudice to [the] defendant's person.' \
“Prejudice is immaterial where consideration of the other three factors ... coalesce in the defendant’s favor.”
\prejudice is immaterial where consideration of the other three factors ... coalesce [sic] in the defendant's favor\
\prejudice is immaterial where consideration of the other three factors .. . coalesce [sic] in the defendant's favor\
“[T]he speedy trial right is designed to protect against two distinct types of prejudice — ‘prejudice to [the] defendant’s defense and prejudice to [the] defendant’s person.’ ”
eight years of unwarranted delay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Certiorari

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Alabama v. Prince

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.