Alabama Pipe Co. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that pretrial proceedings that are open to public support “appearance of fairness” and “encourage a general appreciation of the administration of criminal justice”
• recognizing that pretrial proceedings that are open to public support \appearance of fairness\ and \encourage a general appreciation of the administration of criminal justice\
• noting that since the adoption of the modern State Constitution in 1947, \the rules governing the New Jersey courts have endorsed a strong and consistent policy in favor of open judicial proceedings\
• referring to State v. Hunt, 91 N.J. 338, 358-68, 450 A. 2d 952 (1982) (Handler, J., concurring)
• noting “confluence of the federal and State constitutions in terms of substantive concerns and interpretive philosophy [on issue of First Amendment right of access to criminal proceedings]” and analyzing case under federal principles
• providing: \Preponderance of evidence . . . is evidence sufficient to generate a belief that the conclusion advanced is likely. It has been stated in terms of reasonable probability.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).