Alabama Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Magic City Trucking Service, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding in case wherein both primary insurer and excess insurer were insolvent that, under ambiguous language of excess policy, excess coverage “dropped down” and guaranty association was required to pay full amount recoverable under excess policy
• after noting that the use of both “collectible” and “recoverable” indicate an agreement to drop down, the court ruled that the excess policy, which used the word “collectible” in the limits of liability section, was ambiguous and should be construed in favor of the insured

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).