Alabama Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Kinder-Care, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an insolvent excess insurer claim against the AIGA was not subject to an offset of an insurance payment by the primary insurer, because the \coverage[s] did not overlap\, i.e., duplicate
• holding that an insolvent excess insurer claim against the AIGA was not subject to an offset of an insurance payment by the primary insurer, because the 'coverage[s] did not overlap,' i.e., duplicate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).