Alabama Hospital Association, a Corporation v. Rebecca Beasley, Individually, and in Her Capacity as Commissioner of the Alabama Medicaid Agency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the “mere possibility” that an agency might rescind amendments to its actions or regulations does not enliven a moot controversy
• noting that the \mere possibility\ that an agency might rescind amendments to its actions or regulations does not enliven a moot controversy
• noting that the “mere possibility” that an agency might rescind amendments to its actions or regulations does not enliven a moot controversy
• explaining that the “mere possibility that the state might rescind its recent amendment does not, for purpose of mootness, enliven the controversy”
• “rates properly approved under the reasonable cost standard will satisfy the new efficient cost standard [of the Boren Amendment]”
• in light of statutory violation, we “accordingly remand to the district court so that it may devise an appropriate equitable remedy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).