Alabama Department of Rehabilitation Services v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that inadequacy exception did not apply because there was “no showing” that the relevant federal entity would be “unable to come into compliance” with the RSA
• describing vendors’ “opportunity to convince a [SLA] to take action” through subsection (a)
• “The Randolph-Sheppard Act’s plain language does not expressly require exhaustion, but courts have construed the act’s administrative framework to be mandatory.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).