Ala. Plating v. US Fidelity and Guar.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting principle that the “‘owned property’ exclusion does not exclude coverage for the costs of remediating groundwater contamination”
• accepting without discussion that one year delay was reasonable as a matter of law
• “At a minimum, the word ‘sudden’ is ambiguous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).