Al-Mujahidin v. Harouff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining ALJ not bound to accept counsel’s hypothetical where claimant “offered no convincing proof” of limitation that hypothetical included
• “Nor was the ALJ bound to accept the factual premise of counsel’s hypothetical where it was contradicted by the opinion of a medical professional.”
• “Nor was the ALJ bound to accept the factual premise of counsel’s hypothetical where it was contradicted by the opinion of a medical professional.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).