· 7/7/2009
Al-Khaldiya Electronics & Electrical Equipment Co. v. Boeing Co.
Citations
- 571 F.3d 754
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 14764
- 2009 WL 1919557
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “[s]ummary judgment is appropriate where there is no evidence that the plaintiff was damaged by a breach of contract” (citation omitted)
- stating that under Missouri law, “[e]xpress terms of an unambiguous agreement preclude quantum meruit and unjust enrichment claims”
- “Summary judgment is appropriate where there is no evidence that the plaintiff was damaged by a breach of contract.”
- under Missouri law, there is no breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing where contract expressly allows challenged actions
- under Missouri law “a contract breach that causes no loss to the plaintiff will not support a judgment,” citing Rice
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gruender, Arnold, and Benton, Circuit Judges
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.