Skip to main content
· 7/7/2009

Al-Khaldiya Electronics & Electrical Equipment Co. v. Boeing Co.

Citations

  • 571 F.3d 754
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 14764
  • 2009 WL 1919557

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[s]ummary judgment is appropriate where there is no evidence that the plaintiff was damaged by a breach of contract” (citation omitted)
  • stating that under Missouri law, “[e]xpress terms of an unambiguous agreement preclude quantum meruit and unjust enrichment claims”
  • “Summary judgment is appropriate where there is no evidence that the plaintiff was damaged by a breach of contract.”
  • under Missouri law, there is no breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing where contract expressly allows challenged actions
  • under Missouri law “a contract breach that causes no loss to the plaintiff will not support a judgment,” citing Rice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gruender, Arnold, and Benton, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.