Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc. v. Bush

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that some undisclosed details of the wiretapping program were entitled to protection under the state secrets privilege
• holding that despite plaintiff's formal designation as \global terrorist\ organization subject to NSA surveillance, threat of such surveillance was too speculative to support standing
• concluding that, where a document was subject to the state secrets privilege, the court was required to treat the previously disclosed evidence as unavailable
• holding that despite plaintiffs formal designation as “global terrorist” organization subject to NSA surveillance, threat of such surveillance was too speculative to support standing
• concluding that the “Sealed Document is protected by the state secrets privilege” after reviewing it in camera
• recognizing that Reynolds may result in dismissal even without “await[ing] preliminary discovery”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).