Al De ARTEAGA, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. PALL ULTRAFINE FILTRATION CORPORATION, Defendant, Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that once activated, the presumption required employer to prove that the action in question was not discriminatory
• affirming summary judgment on Law 100 complaint for lack of evidence
• dismissal because employee lacked the necessary technical skills, committed various errors, and did not gain the confidence of the sales staff constituted “just cause”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).