Al-Anazi v. Bush

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• asserting that the petitioners failed to reconcile how the explicit language of § 2242(d) of the FARR Act provides for binding rights outside the context of a final order of removal
• noting that when evaluating a request for an injunction pending appeal, \courts often recast the likelihood of success factor as requiring only that the movant demonstrate a serious legal question on appeal where the balance of harms strongly favors a stay\
• noting that when evaluating a request for an injunction pending appeal, “courts often recast the likelihood of success factor as requiring only that the movant demonstrate a serious legal question on appeal where the balance of harms strongly favors a stay”
• noting the limited nature of a court’s inquiry in extradition proceedings as compared to the Secretary of the State’s

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).