Akzo Nobel Salt, Inc. v. Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the flip-flops here mark the [agency’s] position as the sort of ‘post hoc rationalizations’ to which courts will not defer” (citing Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Comm’n, 499 U.S. 144, 156 (1991))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).