Akwa Vista, LLC v. NRT, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, because defendants had not raised statute of frauds defense either before or during trial, they could not preserve it by raising it in a post-trial motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict
• noting that the jury is “free to accept or reject conflicting evidence and to determine the weight and credence to give evidence”
• involving a plaintiff induced into a contract by negligent misrepresentations
• statute of frauds is an affirmative defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).