Supreme Court of Connecticut· 8/25/1987
Aksomitas v. Aksomitas
Citations
- 205 Conn. 93
- 529 A.2d 1314
- 1987 Conn. LEXIS 984
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Constructive notice does not in all cases provide sufficient notice or a duty to inquire as to who should receive notice.
- “[p]roof by circumstan- tial evidence is sufficient where rational minds could reasonably and logically draw the necessary inferences”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Santaniello
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust FundArizona Supreme Court· 2002-04-09· cited 231×
- Kilduff v. Adams, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-06-18· cited 204×
- Falls Church Group, Ltd. v. Tyler, Cooper & Alcorn, LLPSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-01-23· cited 89×
- Weinstein v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-10-04· cited 60×
- Wagner v. Clark Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-09-02· cited 58×
- Somma v. GraceyConnecticut Appellate Court· 1988-08-02· cited 40×
- Archambault v. WadlowConnecticut Appellate Court· 1991-08-06· cited 36×
- State v. CruzConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-03-11· cited 19×
- Treglia v. ZaneskyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-12-25· cited 14×
- O'Leary v. Industrial Park Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1988-05-17· cited 9×
- State v. KnightConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-08-25· cited 8×
- Dionne v. MarkieConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-08-22· cited 5×
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Az LaborersArizona Supreme Court· 2002-01-18
- Tonetti Ent., Inc. v. Mendon Road Leasing Corp., 06-0704 (r.I.super. 2006)Superior Court of Rhode Island· 2006-04-18
- Levine v. LevineConnecticut Appellate Court· 2026-04-28
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Puro v. HenrySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-09-07· cited 122×
- Bound Brook Ass'n v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-02-18· cited 107×
- Cahill v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-05-11· cited 95×
- DeMilo v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-04-05· cited 91×
- Bleich v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-06-18· cited 90×
- State v. FestoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-06-24· cited 76×
- J. Frederick Scholes Agency v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-09-06· cited 76×
- Zapolsky v. SacksSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-08-23· cited 70×
- Berchtold v. MaggiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-08-30· cited 62×
- Satti v. RagoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-03-02· cited 54×
- Rokus v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-08-09· cited 47×
- Kleinman v. MarshallSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-03-20· cited 39×
- Kolich v. ShugrueSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-01-14· cited 38×
- Chanosky v. City Building Supply Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1965-06-01· cited 36×
- Van Steensburg v. Lawrence & Memorial HospitalsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-09-04· cited 31×
- State v. DudlaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-05-03· cited 29×
- Leone v. KnightonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-06-18· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.