Ohio Supreme Court· 6/12/1923
Akron (City) v. Butler
Citations
- 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 8
- 108 Ohio St. 122
- 140 N.E. 324
- 1923 Ohio LEXIS 227
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Applying Fiorini, courts have consistently held that the appointment of a guardian operates as a conclusive presumption of contractual incapacity in any action to enforce contracts made by the ward during the period of legal guardianship, divesting the ward of any contractual capacity.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hart v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Ohio Court of Appeals· 1963-03-21· cited 4×
- Doe v. Contemporary Servs. Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-21· cited 4×
- In re Guardianship of KindellOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-30· cited 1×
- Broughton v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court· 1957-11-20
- Hack v. City of SalemOhio Supreme Court· 1963-04-17
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.