Skip to main content
· 7/9/2009

Akridge v. Silva

Citations

  • 681 S.E.2d 667
  • 298 Ga. App. 862
  • 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 2379
  • 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 807

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[g]arnishment is purely a statutory proceeding” (punctuation omitted)
  • “Garnishment is purely a statutory proceeding and will not be extended so as to reach money or property of the defendant not made subject thereto by statute.”
  • res judicata did not bar relitigation over proper distribution of funds in bank account, where 7 bankruptcy court order expressly “allow[ed] the state court to determine the proper distribution”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Phipps, Smith, Bernes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.