Akpan v. Etim

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding KPERS participants and other public employees are not arguably indistinguishable and holding in the alternative that there was a rational basis for the challenged classification
• equal protection violation must include demonstration that plaintiffs' treatment resulted from a \'deliberately adopted system'\ that results in \intentional systematic unequal treatment\
• equal protection violation must include demonstration that plaintiffs' treatment resulted from a \'deliberately adopted system'\ that results in \intentional systematic unequal treatment\
• when complaint is that a law causes economic disparity, the rational basis test or “reasonable basis test” is used to determine if tire law violates the Equal Protection Clause
• statute which treats arguably indistinguishable classes of people differently implicates Equal Protection Clause
• statute which treats arguably indistinguishable classes of people differently implicates Equal Protection Clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).