Skip to main content
· 12/21/1984

Aki Saad El'amin v. James E. Pearce, F. Womack, E.J. Calhoun, B.D. Glanville, C.M. Bishop and M v. McDaniels

Citations

  • 750 F.2d 829
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 15731

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a jailer’s use of force against a prisoner is not always a constitutional violation
  • holding that a difference of opinion over the adequacy of medical treatment cannot provide the basis for an Eighth Amendment claim
  • noting that a jailer’s use of force against a prisoner is not always a constitutional violation
  • A mere difference of opinion over the adequacy of medical treatment received cannot provide the basis for an Eighth Amendment claim.
  • A mere difference of opinion over the adequacy of medical treatment received cannot provide the basis for an Eighth Amendment claim.
  • A mere difference of opinion over the adequacy of medical treatment received cannot provide the basis for an Eighth Amendment claim.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barrett, Breitenstein, McKAY

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.