· 12/21/1984
Aki Saad El'amin v. James E. Pearce, F. Womack, E.J. Calhoun, B.D. Glanville, C.M. Bishop and M v. McDaniels
Citations
- 750 F.2d 829
- 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 15731
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a jailer’s use of force against a prisoner is not always a constitutional violation
- holding that a difference of opinion over the adequacy of medical treatment cannot provide the basis for an Eighth Amendment claim
- noting that a jailer’s use of force against a prisoner is not always a constitutional violation
- A mere difference of opinion over the adequacy of medical treatment received cannot provide the basis for an Eighth Amendment claim.
- A mere difference of opinion over the adequacy of medical treatment received cannot provide the basis for an Eighth Amendment claim.
- A mere difference of opinion over the adequacy of medical treatment received cannot provide the basis for an Eighth Amendment claim.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barrett, Breitenstein, McKAY
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.