Akerson v. Pritzker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recommending “that the interest at the statutory rate of nine percent per year should be calculated as of . . . the midpoint between” when the “the outstanding invoices were due”
• recommending “that the interest at the statutory rate of nine percent per year should be calculated as of . . . the midpoint between” when the “the outstanding invoices were due”
• calculating interest on the whole of petitioner's award, then subtracting setoff
• “Under New York law, the court has no discretion to award prejudgment interest at a rate higher than the statutory rate.”
• calculating pre-judgment interest from midpoint of overdue payments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).