District Court of Appeal of Florida· 12/9/2016
A.J.R. v. State
Citations
- 206 So. 3d 140
- 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18198
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding officer not engaged in performance of legal duty where officer chased and took into custody fleeing juvenile who refused to go to school but was still in the presence of their parent
- “We also apply a de novo standard of review to a trial court’s construction of a statute.” (citing State v. C.M., 154 So.3d 1177, 1178 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Khouzam, Lucas, Salario
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 868×
- Kasischke v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-07-10· cited 122×
- Penzer v. Transportation Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida· 2010-01-28· cited 83×
- State v. FuchsSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-09-14· cited 33×
- R.J.K. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-10· cited 19×
- J.W.J. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-11-17· cited 13×
- State v. C.M., a childDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-01-07· cited 12×
- P.B.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-04-27· cited 10×
- D.O. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-12-21· cited 6×
- D.J.D., a child v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-08-06· cited 5×
- D.L.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-06-10· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.