Skip to main content
· 10/31/1996

Ajit K. Medhekar v. United States District Court For The Northern District Of California

Citations

  • 99 F.3d 325
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7966
  • 36 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 321
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 13219
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 28122

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that mandamus is an especially appropriate vehicle for review where the court is confronted with an issue of first impression

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.