A.J.D. Bldg. LLC v. Ben-Harush

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting plaintiff did not contest his claim for in-junctive and declaratory relief under the Ex Post Facto Clause became moot when the USPC agreed to grant him a new parole hearing and apply the 1987 Guidelines
• “Because we conclude that the [Parole Commission] defendants are entitled to qualified immunity, we do not address the issue of absolute immunity.”
• “[T]he 1987 Regulations produce a point scale in which those with a lower point score are deemed suitable for parole. Both [the 2000 Regulations and the 1987 Regulations] allow for departures from their guidelines.”
• resolving a claim of qualified immunity at the motion-to-dismiss stage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).