Aizhen Zhou v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• listing Mr. Byron as making an appearance at the hearing on behalf of Dutchess County
• denying motion to reopen where the “ultimate cause of action movant seeks to bring is futile”
• ”[A]n act entered in violation of the stay is void whether or not a party makes a motion to declare it so.”
• “There is a specific exception to the application of the Rooker-Feldman doctrine when the state court judgment is void.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).