Aitcheson v. Lowe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[i]f consent is given voluntarily, the ensuing search must be conducted within the scope of that -3- J-A18033-21 consent[, and t]he standard for measuring the scope of an individual’s consent is one of [‘]objective reasonableness[’]
• requiring that consent be given during a lawful police interaction
• finding defendant’s claim, that his consent to search “was not voluntarily given based on purported “stealth, deceit and misrepresentation” by police when they extended the duration of a traffic stop to allow time for a K-9 unit to arrive, to be meritless
• failure to limit or revoke consent does not allow an officer carte balance to a limitless search
• “‘Article I § 8 . . . generally provides greater protection . . . because the core of its exclusionary rule is grounded in the protection of privacy while the federal exclusionary rule is grounded in deterring police misconduct.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).