Airwick Industries, Inc. v. Carlstadt Sewerage Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• written by a justice who participated as a judge in the Appellate Division decision in Landy v. Bellmawr Sewerage Auth., supra
• all properties to which service is available should share in the costs of *Page 5 construction and installation as all properties receive some benefit and increase in value regardless of whether they actually use the system
• approving sewer fees to improved and unimproved properties
• “It is therefore seen that the purpose of the annual charge is to raise a sum sufficient to pay (1) all expenses of operation and maintenance and (2) the principal and interest on any bonds and to maintain reserves or sinking funds for the funding of the Authority debt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).