· 10/1/1999
Airport Impact Relief, Inc. v. Wykle
Citations
- 192 F.3d 197
- 30 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20109
- 49 ERC (BNA) 1596
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 24603
- 1999 WL 768213
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- describing sensibleness of presuming that increased noise due to building roadway at a higher elevation than originally planned would be largely offset by decreased noise due to moving roadway further away from area of concern
- noting arguments raised “in a perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at developed argumentation” are waived when they “do not attempt to explain the manner in which the environment will be significantly affected”
- noting arguments raised “in a perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at developed argumentation” are waived when they “do not attempt to explain the manner in which the environment will be significantly affected”
- finding expansion of an airport was not reasonably foreseeable, despite a memorandum of understanding discussing the airport's expansion, because the expansion was \contingent on several events that mayor may not occur over an eight-year span\
- “Issues adverted to in a perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at developed argumentation, are deemed waived for purposes of appeal.”
- “Issues adverted to in a perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at -3- developed argumentation, are deemed waived for purposes of appeal”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Torruella, Lipez, Fuste
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.