Skip to main content
· 10/1/1999

Airport Impact Relief, Inc. v. Wykle

Citations

  • 192 F.3d 197
  • 30 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20109
  • 49 ERC (BNA) 1596
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 24603
  • 1999 WL 768213

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing sensibleness of presuming that increased noise due to building roadway at a higher elevation than originally planned would be largely offset by decreased noise due to moving roadway further away from area of concern
  • noting arguments raised “in a perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at developed argumentation” are waived when they “do not attempt to explain the manner in which the environment will be significantly affected”
  • noting arguments raised “in a perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at developed argumentation” are waived when they “do not attempt to explain the manner in which the environment will be significantly affected”
  • finding expansion of an airport was not reasonably foreseeable, despite a memorandum of understanding discussing the airport's expansion, because the expansion was \contingent on several events that mayor may not occur over an eight-year span\
  • “Issues adverted to in a perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at developed argumentation, are deemed waived for purposes of appeal.”
  • “Issues adverted to in a perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at -3- developed argumentation, are deemed waived for purposes of appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Lipez, Fuste

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.