Airhart v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• proof that a check was embezzled is insufficient to satisfy the allegation of an indictment charging the embezzlement of 'lawful currency'
• proof that a check was embezzled is insufficient to satisfy the allegation of an indictment charging the embezzlement of \lawful currency\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ex Parte Airhart
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1985-07-19· cited 27×
• Kelley v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1981-10-06· cited 19×
• Farley v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1983-08-16· cited 15×
• Shubert v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1986-04-08· cited 13×
• Delevie v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1996-04-19· cited 10×
• Lundy v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1988-01-15· cited 6×
• Airhart v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1984-10-09· cited 4×
• Hall v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2015-08-14· cited 3×
• Lundy v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1987-01-13· cited 1×