Airgo, Inc. v. Horizon Cargo Transport, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a contract is ambiguous “when the terms of the contract are reasonably susceptible to more than one meaning”
• relying on § 187 for the principle that “[w]hen the parties choose the law of a particular state to govern their contractual relationship and the chosen law has some nexus with the parties or the contract, that law will generally be applied”
• “A contract is ambiguous when the terms of the contract are reasonably susceptible to more than one meaning.”
• “A contract is ambiguous when the terms of the contract are reasonably susceptible to more than one meaning.” (Citations omitted.)
• \A contract is ambiguous when the terms of the contract are reasonably susceptible to more than one meaning.\ (Citations omitted.)
• “A contract is 16 ambiguous when the terms of the contract are reasonably susceptible to more than one meaning.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).