Airey v. WAL-MART/SEDGWICK

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reiterating that where pertinent facts are undisputed, issue is one purely of law, subject to de novo review
• noting that when “[t]he pertinent facts are undisputed ... the issue is one purely of law, subject to de novo review”
• noting that when “[t]he pertinent facts are undisputed ... the issue is one purely of law, subject to de novo review”
• reviewing JCC’s dismissal of PFB as time-barred de novo where the pertinent facts were not in dispute, making the issue “one purely of law”
• “A properly drafted petition for benefits tolls the statute of limitations as long as it remains pending.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).